## Weak Pseudorandom Functions in Minicrypt

### Krzysztof Pietrzak and Johan Sjödin

A family of functions is *weakly* pseudorandom if its members are indistinguishable from uniformly random functions when queried on *random* inputs. We point out a subtle ambiguity in the definition of weak PRFs: there are natural weak PRFs whose security breaks down if the randomness used to sample the inputs is revealed. To capture this ambiguity we distinguish between *public-coin* and *secret-coin* weak PRFs. We show that the existence of a secret-coin weak PRF which is *not* also a public-coin weak PRF implies the existence of two pass key-agreement (i.e. public-key encryption). So in Minicrypt, i.e. under the assumption that one-way functions exist but public-key cryptography does not, the notion of public- and secret-coin weak PRFs coincide. Previous to this paper all positive cryptographic statements known to hold exclusively in Minicrypt concerned the adaptive security of constructions using non-adaptively secure components. Weak PRFs give rise to a new set of statements having this property. As another example we consider the problem of range expansion for weak PRFs, we show that in Minicrypt one can beat the best possible range expansion factor (using a fixed number of distinct keys) for a very general class of constructions (in particular, this class contains all constructions we are aware of).

## BibTeX Citation

@misc{PieSjo07b, author = {Krzysztof Pietrzak and Johan Sjödin}, title = {Weak Pseudorandom Functions in Minicrypt}, year = {2007}, note = {Manuscript}, }

## Files and Links

- There are currently no associated files available.